Intermittent FMLA & Omitted Spouses 20:47, July 28, 2016

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

Our Resources

Intermittent FMLA & Omitted Spouses

Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

Q: May employees take FMLA intermittent leave to care for a sick spouse?
A: Since 2009 the regulations haven’t authorized it, but they may soon.

The US Department of Labor (DOL) proposed new rules for the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) on January 30, 2012. Besides expanding family leave benefits for veterans, they also correct a previously existing anomaly that was likely a mistake.

In 2008, the DOL last revised its FMLA regulations after Congress amended the law to provide coverage for military families. Although the FMLA law permits intermittent leave for employees to care for their sick spouses, the DOL’s 2008 FMLA regulations erred by leaving “spouses” off the list of relatives for whom employees may take take intermittent leave.

Specifically, 29 CFR §825.202(b) provides the list of relatives employees may take intermittent leave to care for when they’re sick. And while it lists “parent, son, or daughter,” it doesn’t mention spouses. Similarly, §825.202(b)(1) says:

    “Intermittent leave may be taken for a serious health condition of a parent, son, or daughter, for the employee’s own serious health condition, or a serious injury or illness of a covered servicemember….”

(There’s some evidence that leaving spouses out of §825.202 was a mistake rather than intentional. For example, §825.204(a) specifically mentions transfers as being permissible to accommodate intermittent leave taken for a spouse.)

The DOL’s 2012 proposed regulations corrects this error by adding “spouse” to the list. According to the DOL’s “Section-by-Section Analysis”:

    “The Department also proposes to correct inadvertent drafting errors that were made in the 2008 final rule, including correcting the cross-references in current §825.200(g) and (f), and inserting the word ‘spouse’ in the first lines of §825.202(b) and (b)(1).”

You might also be interested in...

  • A Modern Approach to Age Discrimination IssuesMarch 15, 2017 A Modern Approach to Age Discrimination Issues There are many stereotypes about older workers. They can be seen as more reliable and loyal than younger employees, and they can also be seen as harder-to-train and more expensive because of salaries and health care costs. When employers take an adverse action (such as termination or […] Posted in legal update
  • DOJ’s Disability Rules AmendedAugust 14, 2016 DOJ’s Disability Rules Amended On August 11, 2016, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a final rule amending the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations to incorporate changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). The DOJ regulations prohibit discrimination based on disability in state and […] Posted in workplace discrimination, legal update
LawRoom Blog
EverFi provides online compliance training on sexual harassment, ethics, FCPA and data security to thousands of companies and universities.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

White Paper
Data Security training
for employees

  |   Download White Paper


Compliance Course Catalog
  |   Download Catalog